data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6273d/6273d307ad48119f7850b138bf703beb059e1086" alt=""
It is a half-way house for sex offenders.
Discussing an issue like this is far easier when it is a hypothetical situation or when it is at someone else’s church. But imagine this is happening at your own church right now. What do you do?
Here are some questions to ponder:
How does knowledge of recidivism rates influence your decision? Click here for an excellent article on relapse and recidivism. While the stats vary, I think most would agree that in the short term (3-6 years), child molesters have a 15-20% reconviction rate and rapists have a 20-25% reconviction rate. The reconviction rates are higher in the long-term. And reconviction rates miss the number of actual relapses or reoffenses because so many incidents go unreported. (Click here for more information on sex offenders.)
If you welcome them into your church, how do you keep your congregation safe? What precautions, policies, and procedures should be implemented? What level of risk is acceptable?
If you put large scale policies and procedures in place to keep the congregation safe, how do you justify using the resources needed to do so? Resources of time, energy, and money will be pulled from other ministries. Is this wise?
If you do not welcome them into your church, what do you do instead? Are there any legitimate alternatives?
I am not interested in criticizing this church, regardless of their decision. Nor am I interested in creating controversy. But a healthy dialogue about what it means to be a church might be good for all of us. I would really like to hear your thoughts. In the meantime, here’s a slightly modified portion of an email I wrote to a good friend today (pardon the poor grammar and writing style)…..
“So you know where I stand. I think that these men ought to made a part of the community of faith (if they are asking to join). In fact, of all people on this planet, maybe these kinds of men are the ones in MOST need of a true, genuine, community of faith. As Christians, we are primarily called to be ambassadors, to bring people to Jesus. We are not primarily called to be safe. Working with sex offenders is dangerous, but it is necessary. Rejecting people from the body of Christ (outside of proper church discipline) is tragic, if not unbiblical. I wonder how the parable of the Good Samaritan would apply in this situation. I’d hate for the church to be like the ones who passed these men by as they were lying on the road.
But the church needs to go about this process with a full understanding of the danger involved. No one should water down the facts to make bringing the men to church more palatable. There is real risk involved and the church needs to be wise in setting up policies and procedures.”
AN